Sunday, May 24, 2020

Who Takes Advantage Of Media Coverage - 1379 Words

Who takes Advantage of Media Coverage? Tyasia Senega American River College Media Research Projects Professor Wilbur Johnson November 25th, 2015 Abstract Media coverage over the years has expanded quickly with the help of new age technology, forcing today’s society on total reliance of media coverage. With the news in the palm of our hands, we are constantly being updated on worldwide dilemmas every second, but who takes advantage of coverage? Using coverage for the downfall of others or to help them prosper. As I have channeled my research on how politics, uses both negative and positive coverage to assist them during elections and small businesses and major corporation needing media coverage to be viewed as credible. Many†¦show more content†¦Various types of media coverage exist and some of these can be used in a good way while others may be used in a bad way. It is common, before to the Second World War, for governments to use the media to make other(s) countries look bad and during that time, media wasn’t as advanced as it is now. The types of media coverage was very limited, still media could be used to he lp the downfall of a world leader and its country. Political Figures and Major Companies Many politicians, if not all I believe use the media to its upmost advantage - for better and worst. Media and politics will always go hand in hand. Politicians rely on the media to get the exposure they need to win elections. Reporters and journalist are demanded to cover the people chosen to lead government. But in election years, people who work in media should prepare themselves for the manipulation they ll likely face when a politician s quest for office runs suddenly into the media s eagerness to seek the truth. The way for a candidate to get media coverage is to invite reporters to a news conference for a mandatory announcement. That announcement could be the same over exaggerated economic idea that has been discussed plenty of times. These conferences are to get you there to cover the candidate. Senator Trent Lott, was on his way of becoming majority leader of the U.S Senate. In 2002 of December, Sen. Lott’s downfall began when an ABC News

Wednesday, May 13, 2020

George Orwell s Animal Farm - 1395 Words

George Orwell’s Animal Farm: The Power of Corruption In George Orwell’s Animal Farm, Orwell illustrates how power corrupts absolutely and how Napoleon degrades the structure and stability of Animal Farm because of the decisions that he makes. I will also expand on the idea of how Old Major’s ideas for an organized society get completely destroyed by Napoleon’s revolutionary actions. It was ironic and satirical that Napoleon’s own power annihilates Animal Farm. The satire in George Orwell’s Animal Farm expresses the idea of self-government through the animals. The animals are being personified, having human characteristics. The animals choose that they want to run the farm by themselves, so they create a way of living called Animalism. There are two major ides of Animalism, one is that all animal are to be treated equally, and the other is no animals should gain human characteristics. These principles are the base and foundation of the Seven Commandments (what the animals follow). As soon as this new system is developed, they throw out all of the humans that run the farm. Even though the commandments say that all animals are supposed to be equal, the pigs begin to take control. The most important pigs are Napoleon and Snowball, who are in charge of the farm until Napoleon throws out Snowball from the farm. Through this satire, George Orwell shows how power corrupts by showing the pigs actions. In the story Old Major, an animal on the farm who was respected, gave a speechShow MoreRelatedGeorge Orwell s Animal Farm958 Words   |  4 PagesImagine that you were an animal s or citizen living under Napoleon or Stalin rule and the fear that your life can be taken always from you at any time. In the novel of Animal Farm, George Orwell he wanted to show how a book is a sarcasm of the Russian Revolution during the communist years and the satire of that time between Trotsky and Stalin. Where Orwell chose to create his character base of the common people of Russia at the time of the Revolution. Animal Farm is a social or allegory about NapoleonRead MoreGeorge Orwell s Animal Farm1361 Words   |  6 Pagesfarmer, but of late he had fallen on evil days†(Orwell 38). In Animal Farm George Orwell describes life for the animals on a farm in the english countryside during the mid to early 20th century before, during and after a revolution against their master Mr.Jones in order to r epresent the russian revolution and describe to people throughout the free world how leaders in both capitalist and communist societies oppress the working class as a result Orwell s tone throughout the novel is concerned. TsarRead MoreGeorge Orwell s Animal Farm1392 Words   |  6 Pages George Orwell Never Misuses Words In what was a vastly controversial novel published in 1945, George Orwell’s Animal Farm describes the horrific brand of communism in the Soviet Union and the conscious blindness that most of the West accepted at that time. Although Orwell labeled Animal Farm as a fairy tale, this historically parallel novel branches into the genres of political satire, fable, and allegory as well. What made Animal Farm so controversial among the â€Å"British socialists† and WesternRead MoreGeorge Orwell s Animal Farm922 Words   |  4 Pages In the novel Animal Farm, by George Orwell, the wisest boar of the farm, Old Major, mimics Karl Marx, the â€Å"Father of Communism,† and Vladimir Lenin, a Russian communist revolutionary. George Orwell introduces direct parallels between the respected figures through their mutual ideas of equality and profoundly appreciated qualities. Furthermore, his utilization of dialect and descriptions represent the key ideas of the novel. Throughout the novel, Orwell continues to show comparisons betweenRead MoreGeorge Orwell s Animal Farm1463 Words   |  6 Pagesbut of late he had fallen on evil days†(Orwell 38). In Animal Farm, George Orwell describes life for the animals on a farm in the English countryside during the mid to early 20th century before, during and after a revolution against their master, Mr.Jones. Orwell does this to represent the Russian revolution and describe to people throughout the free world how leaders in both capitalist and communist societi es oppress the working class. As a result Orwell s tone throughout the novel is concernedRead MoreGeorge Orwell s Animal Farm1645 Words   |  7 PagesPeople respond to control and power differently for various reasons, however, one of the main reasons is based on their personality; their confidence and intelligence. In, Animal Farm by George Orwell, confidence and intelligence is a big factor for why certain animals obtained power and control and why other ones did not. People with confidence and intelligence are likely to gain most of the control and power. People with little intelligence, but lots of confidence are more likely to have someRead MoreGeorge Orwell s Animal Farm1449 Words   |  6 Pagesconcept that the animals in George Orwell’s novel Animal Farm crave. The animals of Animal Farm want freedom from their â€Å"dictator† Farmer Jones and the rest of humanity. Their problem is that Farmer Jones and humanity are still in power. With the bravery of two pigs, Napoleon and Snowball, the animals overthrow their human oppressors and free themselves from humanity. With his new freedom Napoleon craves power and expels Snowball. He becomes the dictator of Animal Farm and makes the farm a place whereRead MoreGeorge Orwell s Animal Farm1360 Words   |  6 Pagesquestion minus the answer.† In George Orwell’s â€Å"Animal Farm†, the author raises the question whether the type of government, communism, is feasible in a community without leading to a type of dictatorship or totalitarianism. Orwell presents the idea that communism is a good idea in theory, but it always leads to corruption by the people who take power. The author presents the novel as an entertaining fable featuring an animal revolution; however, beneath this storyline Orwell utilizes literary devicesRead MoreGeorge Orwell s Animal Farm1403 Words   |  6 PagesGeorge Orwell believes â€Å"What you get over and over again is a movement of the proletaria t which is promptly characterized and betrayed by astute people at the top and then the growth of a new governing class. The one thing that never arrives is equality† (Letemendia 1). Orwell simply loathes revolution and thinks it is unfair to the majority, for the people. He thinks that while individuals change, the people in power are always corrupt and they will corrupt any attempt at change. He communicatesRead MoreGeorge Orwell s Animal Farm1255 Words   |  6 Pagesrebellion in history. With these principles at heart, it only seems logical that human society should become utopian. Despite the principles, the French revolution paved the way for the autocratic rule of Napoleon. History repeats itself; George Orwell’s Animal Farm follows the rise of Animalism which serves as an allegorical reflection of the 1917 Russian revolution that led into the Stalinist era. Many revolutions throughout history follow the same path as the newly installed government always become

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Define Love Free Essays

When it comes to love in needs a few thing and some of them are passion, intimacy and commitment. However depending the type of love or relationship varies. Passion is a form of an emotion that is how you feel someone, and intimacy is a measurement of how close you are to someone or familiar with them. We will write a custom essay sample on Define Love or any similar topic only for you Order Now Finally commitment is the act of being committed or committing yourself, to someone a measurement of loyalty. Now for each of love or relationship these three things are provided in different ways. Such as in a relationship with a friend the loyalty is strong and a form of passion and intimacy happens on a low enough level that most do not become physically engaged with each other. Now a family relationship these three things happen a slightly higher level with an extremely low level of physical of engagement such a hug or a kiss on the chick. Now a mutual relationship between two people unrelated in anyway, may have been friends at one point and time; but the level have increase in a way that there may or may not been some kind of physical engagement , a form of loyalty (commitment), passion and intimacy on a high level. All three of these form of relationship meaning and purpose are very different but the thing they have in common is very much the just in different intervals. It all boiling down to who, what, where, when, and how; But to try define something based emotion and the human mind is to try and define why most water runs south or why the wind blows or how the earth is the only inhabited planet. Each one of these is related because all relationships need these three things to function. To be hones this is all I can write about this, but if I must write more, I strongly believe that love is what really makes the world go round and develop people on a mysterious ways. Explaining how you believe an individual’s attachment style can affect the types of love relationships he or she has. An individual’s attachment style can greatly affect the type of love of relationships he or she has because, the attachment is define on the type of relationship as well the relationship, define one the attachment. This can also cause trouble among a relationship because one person’s level of attachment maybe stronger than the others. Or someone who is attached to someone who is not; this is how in some cases stalking happens or heart break. An attachment affects someone relationship because there is a need for attachment, where there is a need, there is a want as well as a requirement. Basically what I mean is the attachment defines a relationship because the attachment is based on the emotionally as well as the physical that is geared towards the person the attachment is for. An attachment is a bases as well as glue for a relationship defining it in a way for it to grow and be prosperous. And as a relationship grows so does the relationship, thou I still warn of an over attachment, in some instances it can become dangerous. Different level of attachment is how you are attached or feel towards your, sister, your mother, father, mother, daughter, son, friend and neighbors. Its how you are and feel towards each person you meet on your day to day life. as well as the people who come and go in your life. Building attachment and relationship as your grow old. It is the nesseccary good and evil of a relationship because attachments don’t always stay as they sometimes go and fade away. How can you ask someone to define an attachment, because no one really know except from their own experience, to define something from their own experience show the truth of their deferment and so the true color of what is meant in their words. Can it be expanded it a certain amount of words, maybe or maybe not; because people do run out of things to say. What I want to say is this, if you are not attached to the person whom you have a relationship with; no matter what level it is, and then you do not have a relationship. What is that you do have I cannot say, but it is best not spend time on it and is will benefit both if you simply walk away from it. So you have to view attachment from a certain view point and frankly it goes to a point of how the heart feels. An attachment is based on the relationship and affects the relationship because the attachment is based on the relationship, the level of love (sounding a little repeating because of the unessacery word count needed) . the attachment brings some together and some apart. The attachment is the defining moment in some cases when it is discovered. For an example when I discovered the attachment that I had to the women who later becomes my wife, I was overjoyed and pursued the attachment so I could keep the filling of happiness. We have now been married for five years and I couldn’t be even more happier. The attachment started our relationship and has defined it for these last five year and that is my point on how attachment affects relationships. If there where was anything else I could say about this then I would but I have ran out of words. How to cite Define Love, Papers

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Futzing Around With Sexual Stereotypes Essay Example For Students

Futzing Around With Sexual Stereotypes Essay ith neither money nor careers at stake, caution is unnecessary, you can do anything, said Michael Smith, an important figure in the Off Off-Broadway movement, about the glib attitude and openness of Off Off-Broadway Theater. An anything goes attitude was the essence of avant-garde theater. Fittingly, nakedness on stage was not uncommon in the Off Off-Broadway theaters. John Elsom, an expert of eroticism in the theater, stated, nakedness meant freedom: clothes and respectability tyranny (200). Homosexuality was even more commonplace and seemed to be considered fashionable by these avant-garde artists. The mere existence of radical Off Off-Broadway Theater served as a catalyst for more open sexuality, especially nakedness on stage, homosexuality, and the involvement of women in theater and popular culture. In Rochelle Owenss play Futz, the shock value is bestiality. Cy Futz openly loves his sow, Amanda, and his society does not accept this and persecutes him. Owens uses bestiality to represent a lifestyle that an individual leads that is not accepted by society, like homosexuality, and the ridiculous persecution by society for a lifestyle that is different than normal. Futz embodies three distinct aspects of avant-garde theater in New York: the emergence of nudity on stage, the surfacing of homosexuality in the arts, and the liberation of women; Futz manifests the changing political and social attitudes of the times. Nudity and erotic messages were used to shock the audience, very much like Antonin Artaud, whose techniques and theories influenced the development of avant-garde theater. Stavros Kolliopoulos says in his article about Artaud that he sought to establish a physical language without transcendental references, directing his fury against society in a state of constant confrontation. Artaud saw theater as a primal force and believed in the expression of primitivism in his work (Harding 60). The importance of nakedness had two distinct motives, yet only the second pertains to Owens play. These moments of nudity caused exposure for the performance, but more importantly, nakedness symbolized a rejection of middle-class standards (Elsom 200). Owens, by the mere fact that she was involved with Off Off-Broadway Theater, was rejecting middle-class standards. She was not, on the other hand, using sexuality and nudity to cause exposure, for popular success was of little importance to her and to Off Off-Broadway as a whole. Futz and all of Off Off-Broadway was a reaction against mass-marketing and monotonous commercialism. Emory Lewis wrote in his chronology of theater that most of the young, fearless explorers start off with the radical premise that there is another America and another culture conveniently ignored by the mass media; they are in absolute revolt against the Establishment and those they regard as its brainwashed followers (138-9). This movement embodied the many protests of the time, and it manifested the doing-your-own-thing aspect of the counterculture revolution. Of course an institution built and prided on such a removal from consumer society would include nudity and sex. The novelty of nakedness on stage wore thin when nudity became more of a crucial aspect to other mediums of entertainment, such as film and nowadays, nudity on stage and in film is ordinary and has no apparent shock value. Tom OHorgans work, most specifically Futz, became famous because of its scandalous nature of the sexual-erotic content, the seemingly orgiastic physicality, and the occasional near or full nudity (Aronson 96). Tom OHorgan was the original director for Futz in Ellen Stewarts La Mama Experimental Theater Club. OHorgan gained notoriety from his work in the first ever rock opera, Hair. OHorgan followed four elements to his direction (Berkowitz 146). First, he attempted to de-emphasize the text and concentrate on the performance and the emotion of the live actors. Second, he had his characters communicate nonverbally at times and explored nonrational communication. Third, he tried to make the audience and the actors interact, thus breaking down the fourth wall. .u39f29e06236f85d9b46e3cdc087c4dcf , .u39f29e06236f85d9b46e3cdc087c4dcf .postImageUrl , .u39f29e06236f85d9b46e3cdc087c4dcf .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u39f29e06236f85d9b46e3cdc087c4dcf , .u39f29e06236f85d9b46e3cdc087c4dcf:hover , .u39f29e06236f85d9b46e3cdc087c4dcf:visited , .u39f29e06236f85d9b46e3cdc087c4dcf:active { border:0!important; } .u39f29e06236f85d9b46e3cdc087c4dcf .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u39f29e06236f85d9b46e3cdc087c4dcf { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u39f29e06236f85d9b46e3cdc087c4dcf:active , .u39f29e06236f85d9b46e3cdc087c4dcf:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u39f29e06236f85d9b46e3cdc087c4dcf .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u39f29e06236f85d9b46e3cdc087c4dcf .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u39f29e06236f85d9b46e3cdc087c4dcf .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u39f29e06236f85d9b46e3cdc087c4dcf .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u39f29e06236f85d9b46e3cdc087c4dcf:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u39f29e06236f85d9b46e3cdc087c4dcf .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u39f29e06236f85d9b46e3cdc087c4dcf .u39f29e06236f85d9b46e3cdc087c4dcf-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u39f29e06236f85d9b46e3cdc087c4dcf:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Team Player EssayFinally, he tried to utilize all aspects of the theater and the current technology. He used all of these aspects in his production of Futz. At times during OHorgans performances the actors became vulnerable, stopped acting, and were naked for the audience to see. The fourth wall had been broken down, and the actors had entered into the audiences space. This created a cult-like atmosphere for the actors and discomforted the audience. The actors had thus succeeded, for the audiences had great trouble distinguishing the theater from real life, for that is the purpose of theater. In Futz, there is little nudity explicitly written in the script. Gerald Berkowitz, an expert in avant-garde theater, wrote the following about OHorgans performance of Futz. OHorgan provided physical expression of the texts ideas and emotions through film, mime, music, and dance, turning the villagers into a many-headed chorus of interchangeable roles so that they functioned as Society rather than as individuals (145). OHorgans style to directing plays was exaggeration, as shown by Berkowitzs quote. If a character was supposed to be mad, he had the character burst out in violent rage.